WebJan 19, 2024 · The Wagon Mound (2) [1967] 1 AC 617 Case summary last updated at 2024-01-19 11:43:35 UTC by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team. Judgement for the case The Wagon Mound (2) D carelessly let oil spill into the water, which spread to where X was repairing P’s ship. It was thought unlikely that the oil would catch fire and so X carried on … WebJan 16, 2009 · The foreseeable consequences of spilling a large quantity of furnace oil from the ss. Wagon Mound into Sydney Harbour have been in dispute now in two separate appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. The cases will go down to posterity as The Wagon Mound ( No. 1) and The Wagon Mound ( No. 2).
Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd
WebCase: The Wagon Mound (1961) Within the principles of remoteness of damage, damage will only be compensable where that damage could have been reasonably foreseen by the … WebWagon Mound (No. 1) v. FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES JUDGMENT OF THE LORDS OF THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL, DELIVERED THE … increase incoming call volume on samsung
CAUSATION IN THE LAW: A COMMENT ON
WebThe Wagon Mound was distinguished on two grollnds. In the first place, it was said that the Judicial Committee had not contem-plated the thin-skull type of case. It has always been the accepted ... [1961] 1 W.L.R. 1434 the defendants were owners and occupiers of premises including a piece of open grassland, called the Green, ... WebCausation. If the breach of duty could be proved, did it lead to the damages? According to the s3 of the Compensation Act 2006, what if Ploymart could provide a better security services, the staffs of supermarket could pay more attention on Emma and gave help, the injury would not occur (Cork v Kirby MacLean).Therefore the negligence of Ploymart did … WebSee Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co., Ltd., [1961] A.C. 388 (P.C. Aust.) [ Wagon Mound No. 1 ]. On appeal, the Privy Council in that case held that imposing negligence liability for a careless act was improper where damages were not reasonably foreseeable. increase indent meaning